Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
https://dujal.nl/
<p><img style="margin: 0px 40px 0 0;" src="https://platform.openjournals.nl/dujal/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/51" alt="DuJAL" width="300" height="237" align="left" hspace="10" vspace="10" /></p> <p style="font-size: 16px;"><br />The <em>Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics</em> (DuJAL) <span style="font-weight: 400;">is the official journal of the Dutch Association of Applied Linguistics (Anéla). It publishes research on (second) language use, learning, teaching and policy and particularly values both theoretically and practically driven research that is of societal relevance.</span></p> <p style="font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">DuJAL encourages open science, allows for publication of instruments and data, and publishes on a rolling basis.</span></p> <p> </p>Anélaen-USDutch Journal of Applied Linguistics2211-7253Intensification strength in speech: language-specific preferences and differences between native and learner language
https://dujal.nl/article/view/13327
<p style="font-weight: 400;">In this article we analyse the use of intensification in the spoken productions of French-speaking learners of Dutch and English. We compare the strength of intensifiers used by learners in their first language (L1) and in their additional language (AL), and contrast these results with data from control groups of L1 speakers. Our corpus results indicate that L1 English speakers tend to intensify more frequently but opt for weaker intensifiers, while L1 French speakers intensify less frequently but use stronger intensifiers. L1 Dutch speakers take the middle position in both aspects. The analysis of the learner corpora reveals overall more similarities between AL English and L1 English than between AL Dutch and L1 Dutch, confirming the trends observed in previous studies on the same learners (Hendrikx, 2019).</p>Isa HendrikxKristel Van GoethemNatacha Buntinx
Copyright (c) 2024 Isa Hendrikx, Kristel Van Goethem, Natacha Buntinx
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024-03-142024-03-141310.51751/dujal13327Diamond is a scientist’s best friend
https://dujal.nl/article/view/18802
<p>The field of applied linguistics is increasingly adopting open science practices. As open access publication gains traction, ethical issues emerge that need to be addressed by the field. This viewpoint paper addresses the concern that open science is not equally open for everyone. This paper describes how open access publication is increasingly being commercialized and explains how open access publication coincides with systemic inequality. We offer the following viewpoints for the field to consider:</p> <ol> <li>We are morally obligated to make our research output accessible.</li> <li>Hybrid, Gold, and Green open access publishing lead to systemic inequality in open access publishing, benefiting commercial publishers and those working in research-intensive universities and rich countries.</li> <li>Diamond open access publication removes the systemic inequalities; hence, Diamond open access should be prioritized over Hybrid, Gold, and Green open access publication models.</li> <li>We should move away from publish-and-read agreements and Green open access publishing, because they prevent system change.</li> <li>Through our choices in our work as researchers, editors, reviewers, authors and teachers, we can contribute to the transition towards truly equitable open access publishing practices.</li> <li>Senior researchers are in the position and have the moral obligation to be drivers of these changes.</li> </ol> <p> </p>Sible AndringaMaria MosCatherine van BeuningenPaz GonzálezJos HornikxRasmus Steinkrauss
Copyright (c) 2024 Sible Andringa; Maria Mos, Catherine van Beuningen, Paz González, Jos Hornikx, Rasmus Steinkrauss
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024-03-142024-03-141310.51751/dujal18802